divisor-avatars.md
2.9 kB · markdown
Divisor avatars
- 2026-08-28 [Proved] The Avatar Theorem: for
x = prod p_i^(a_i)withp_1 < ... < p_dimand everya_i >= 1, thedim-axis design withf_w = e_w(a_1 - 1, ..., a_dim - 1)hasP(n) = d(x^n)at everyn >= 0, by the substitutiona_i n + 1 = b_i n + (n + 1)andprod (b_i t + 1) = sum_w e_w(b) t^watt = n/(n+1); the map is injective by Newton's identities and surjective onto thef_0 = 1signatures whose fill splits completely into linear factors overQ, and a design exists iffsum_i (a_i - 1) <= dim; the first ten colossally abundant numbers2, 6, 12, 60, 120, 360, 2520, 5040, 55440, 720720have avatars while the first without one is21621600; on the sevendim = 3laddersx = 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 900ton = 20, all 131 of the 140 powers exceeding 5040 satisfy Robin's inequality, the largest ratioR(14400) = 1.5732599059againste^gamma = 1.7810724180, margin0.2078125121, strictly decreasing innon every ladder, which proves nothing about Robin beyond them;sigma(m)/m < sigma(N)/Nfor everym < Ndefines a superabundant number, not a highly abundant one. Witness: divisor-avatars. - 2026-08-28 [Proved] The sigma-hunt is closed negatively for polynomial census laws: no census law of a design at odd side
2n + 1equalssigma_k(x^n)fork >= 1,x > 1, since that grows at least likex^(kn)while every such law is a polynomial innof degree at mostdim, and none equalssigma(x^n)/x^n, strictly increasing and bounded hence not constant; atx = 1both collapse to the nine constant identitiesO(n) = 1 = d(1^n); over the nine observables (fill, voids, surface, touched vertices, edges, faces, Euler characteristic, components, cycle rank) on all 22 least-mask representatives of the 256 base-2 3D designs counted through side 21, exactly eight non-fill strict divisor avatars survive, only for voids, Euler characteristic and components;EandRvanish atn = 0whiled(x^0) = 1, so they are never strict identities, and the four graph laws for codes 30 and 126 hold only forn >= 1; ifsigmais a design observable at all it lives among geometrically growing counts. Witness: divisor-avatars. - 2026-08-28 [Verified] The eight non-fill divisor avatars come from topology, not measure: the empty design's voids
(2n+1)^3 = d(900^n); Euler characteristic and components both(n+1)^3 = d(30^n)for{000}; both(n+1)^2 = d(6^n)for{000, 100}; componentsn + 1 = d(2^n)for the three-corner path{000, 100, 010}; bothn + 1 = d(2^n)for the square face{000, 100, 010, 110}; plus nine constant identitiesO(n) = 1 = d(1^n), components for codes23, 27, 31, 61, 63, 111, 127, 255and Euler for 255; the statement is for the canonical least-mask representatives, since cube symmetry does not preserve the odd/even origin under coordinate reversal; codes 15 and 27 share a weight signature and a fill law, so eight orbits carry seven weight signatures. Witness: divisor-avatars.