layers-as-a-dilation-system.md
2.8 kB · markdown
The layers as a dilation system
- 2026-09-09 [Proved] The stack's layers are a dilation system: the square wave
s(x) = (-1)^floor(x)is the odd 2-periodic extension of the constant 1, so the layerss(nx)are the dilates of one function in the sense of Hedenmalm, Lindqvist and Seip, with sine coefficientsa_n = 2 sqrt 2/(pi n)on oddnand 0 on even, and the symbolS(s) = (2 sqrt 2/pi)(1 - 2^(-1-s)) zeta(1 + s); the moire correlation law is exactly that system's Gram matrixsum_j a_(j n') a_(j m'), its both-odd hypothesis being the symbol's support on the odd integers, the lcm-grid integral and the symbol sum agreeing at all 78 pairsm <= n <= 12(1/15at(3,5),1/3at(3,9), 0 at(2,3)); the Gram vanishes unlessv_2(m) = v_2(n)and every block is the odd Gram, so the full system's Gram operator is a direct sum of copies of the odd one and the half-period form is one block over 4. Witness: lab/py/stack-dilationscheck_dilation_shift,check_gram_two_ways,check_blocks. - 2026-09-09 [Proved] The parity layers are complete and minimal in
L^2(0,1)but neither a Riesz basis nor a frame: the Riesz criterion needs the symbol bounded onRe s > 0andSis unbounded at the pole ofzeta(1 + s)(Hedenmalm-Lindqvist-Seip Theorems 5.2 and 3.1), the normalised coefficientsa_n/a_1being totally multiplicative with divergent prime sum (Corollary 5.3), completeness and minimality following from Corollary 5.8 with the biorthogonal system built from the Dirichlet inversemu(n)/non oddnand not itself a dilation system; the sharp frame bounds are the supremum and infimum of|S|on the half-plane, infinity and zero; the parity stack is the boundary casetau = 1of the source's examplezeta(tau + s), Riesz ifftau > 1. Witness: lab/py/stack-dilationscheck_inverse, REFS.md. - 2026-09-09 [Proved] No weighting of the scales moves the stack's symbol off the line
Re s = 1: a weight multiplies the symbol by its own Dirichlet series at the sames, and the Mobius weight givesa_1^2/S, the reciprocal up toa_1^2 = 8/pi^2; over the firstKodd scaleslambda_maxrises2.01467to2.47224andlambda_minfalls0.4393to0.3570forK = 25to200, condition number4.586to6.926, the determinant exact against the Smith product atK = 1..13. Witness: lab/py/stack-dilationscheck_inverse,spectrum,check_determinant. - 2026-09-09 [Refuted] The pole heuristic that the largest Gram eigenvalue grows like
(log N)^2: the spectral norm of a gcd matrix at exponent one overkdistinct integers is of order(log log k)^2by Lewko and Radziwill 2014 Theorem 2, which settles the exponent-one case that Gal 1949 bounded for the gcd sum, and the window agrees, the(log N)^2ratio falling 1.93 acrossK = 25..200against 1.41 for(log log N)^2. Witness: REFS.md, lab/py/stack-dilationsspectrum.