Order Sensitivity of Kronecker Design Words: What the Perfect Shuffle Cannot SeeOrder Sensitivity of Kronecker Design Words: What the Perfect Shuffle Cannot See

Order Sensitivity of Kronecker Design Words: What the Perfect Shuffle Cannot See

MrlyProd

First published 2026-08-23, revised 2026-09-08

PDF · TeX

Nest one small black-and-white pattern inside another, then swap the order of the nesting. The picture keeps its size and its number of black cells, and every algebraic thing about it - rank, determinant, spectrum, trace - stays put, because the two orders differ by a perfect shuffle of rows and columns. But a shuffle does not preserve which cells touch which. So the picture can fall apart into twice as many pieces, and this paper says exactly which observables that breaks and how early.

Two designs nested both ways: four isolated cells one way, two dominoes the other, four black cells either way.
Two designs nested both ways: four isolated cells one way, two dominoes the other, four black cells either way.

A design is a two-by-two square with some of its four cells filled, so there are sixteen of them. A word w=(c1,,cL)w = (c_1, \dots, c_L) of designs gives the 2L×2L2^L \times 2^L picture Aw=Ac1AcLA_w = A_{c_1} \otimes \cdots \otimes A_{c_L}, outermost factor first. An observable is order-blind if it depends only on the multiset of letters, and order-sensitive if reordering can change it.

Theorem. comp(A3A6)=4\operatorname{comp}(A_3 \otimes A_6) = 4 and comp(A6A3)=2\operatorname{comp}(A_6 \otimes A_3) = 2, and among the six two-cell designs a connected pair against a diagonal pair never commutes: always 44 against 22. Connected pairs commute with connected pairs, diagonal pairs with diagonal pairs, and every pair of designs with three or more cells gives 11 in both orders.

The proofs are contact geometry: two adjacent copies of a tile touch only when its facing edges share a filled row or column, and that contact count is a product over the factors, so it cannot see the order - while the merging it permits can. Beyond the theorems the paper ships an exhaustive census (over the 105105 reorderable length-two multisets: components split on 7474, Euler characteristic on 7878, perimeter on 7878, holes on 1010, boundary cells on none) and six explicit 4×44 \times 4 integer matrices whose products reproduce the component count of every one of the 54,24154{,}241 words of length at most four, zero mismatches. Why the rank is 44 is open, and an earlier claim that no such representation could exist is retracted in the paper, with its date.

  • component-exponent-of-kronecker-words - the sequel: closed forms for the component count on all 105 two-letter alphabets, and the growth rate they give, which is order-blind at every interior letter frequency.
  • paper.pdf - the paper.
  • tectonic paper.tex rebuilds it; python3 scripts/verify.py re-checks every number in about four seconds; python3 scripts/figure.py redraws the witness.