
Integers
Which integers this work writes, which it never writes, and which it writes many times - taken over the whole registry rather than over one favourite sequence. The sequences ledger asks whether a given sequence is known; this page asks the opposite question, what the union of every sequence the registry holds covers, and answers it by census.
The generator is lab/integer-census, one pass over mrlylab::ledger::keys, which prints its definition before any table and writes rows.csv, multiset.csv and a manifest into a directory given on the command line. Every number below is a line of that run. The registry it walks is the one sequences is rendered from and the sequences demo searches live; the closed forms it replays are the fill law and the exposure recurrence of the sequence-census paper.
Proved means a proof is given here; Verified means recomputed by the study; Conjecture means neither; Refuted means the study kills it.
The definition
The census is only as good as its window, so the window is pinned and printed, never assumed.
- A registry row is one
(design, measure, axis)key ofmrlylab::ledger::keysover the four cost tiers. - A row's rendered window is its first
min(48, B)terms,Bthe leading terms whose footprint fits100000cells, under the ledger's own budget of100000cells a term. - A term's footprint is 1 cell for a closed measure,
number^dimension + level * spanfor a convolved measure,number^(dimension * level)for a grid measure. - A row whose rendered terms are strictly increasing stops at the first term above
100000; the count of rows truncated this way is printed, never assumed to lose nothing. - Row
Rwritesniffnis a term ofRinsideR's rendered window and1 <= n <= 100000. - Multiplicity counts rows, not
(row, index)pairs: a row writingnat several indices counts once. - An integer
nappears iff some row writes it, and is missed iff no row writes it.
The census
- The registry is 18066 rows and every tier count is derived twice. Verified. 7692 closed, 5044 convolved, 2665 side grid, 2665 level grid, each matched against an independent count over
SPACES,ledger::designsandMeasure::applies; no row goes unread. Truncation is declared and counted: 5529 rows stop at the ceiling, 6802 at the 48-term cap, 5735 at a cell budget, and 390 write no integer in the window at all. - The two readings of multiplicity differ, and the honest one is smaller. Verified. There are 347308
(row, integer)incidences against 360703(row, index, integer)incidences, so 13395 times a row writes the same integer twice and the row reading refuses to count it twice. 29144 rendered terms are at or below zero - Euler characteristics, the voids of a solid design - and are excluded and reported, never folded in.
| window | never | once | multiple | written | share written |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1..=1000 | 41 | 31 | 928 | 959 | 0.9590 |
1..=10000 | 3589 | 765 | 5646 | 6411 | 0.6411 |
1..=100000 | 88867 | 2897 | 8236 | 11133 | 0.1113 |
| decade | width | missed | miss density |
|---|---|---|---|
1..9 | 9 | 0 | 0.000000 |
10..99 | 90 | 0 | 0.000000 |
100..999 | 900 | 41 | 0.045556 |
1000..9999 | 9000 | 3548 | 0.394222 |
10000..99999 | 90000 | 85278 | 0.947533 |
- The written set is finite, so the miss density tends to 1. Proved. A row renders at most 48 terms, so whatever the ceiling, the registry writes at most
48 * 18066 = 867168integers. The registry is a fixed finite object and the integers are not: past867168the census is almost all miss, and no growth of the ceiling changes that. This is the one statement on the page that survives any change of window.
The miss set
- Every integer to 268 is written and the first miss is a prime. Verified. 269 is missed, and
1..268is the longest written run in the window; the longest missed run is 447 wide, on95265..95711, with 95264 and 95712 both written. The ceiling itself, 100000, is written by 103 rows. The first thirty misses are269, 362, 422, 443, 446, 487, 502, 538, 607, 611, 618, 626, 643, 653, 659, 668, 677, 691, 698, 701, 709, 723, 758, 773, 787, 797, 803, 835, 857, 878. - The miss set is not a union of residue classes. Refuted. All 2079 classes mod
2..64hold a written integer on10000..100000, exhaustively; no modulus in that range separates written from missed. - The bias is divisibility and smoothness, not congruence. Verified. On the tail
10000..100000the written count by residue mod 12 runs1175, 440, 145, 194, 715, 176, 420, 224, 531, 358, 229, 116, a ratio of10.13between residue 0 and residue 11, and mod 6 it runs1595, 664, 676, 552, 944, 292, a ratio of5.46. Sorted by greatest prime factor the written share on the same band falls0.5798,0.1406,0.0506,0.0313,0.0117across the bands1..10,10..100,100..1000,1000..10000,10000..100000. Of the 9592 primes, 750 are written and only 158 of the 8363 above10000; the first missed prime is 269, the first missed integer. - Every cube, fourth, fifth and sixth power is written; the squares are not. Verified. Cubes
46/46, fourth powers17/17, fifth10/10, sixth6/6, all of1..100000. Squares run176/316: every square to98^2 = 9604is written and99^2 = 9801is not, and the largest written square is97969 = 313^2, written by exactly one row,mrly_bang_d4_28662.voids.side, whose closed form4k^4 - 8k^3 + 8k^2 - 4k + 1is the square of the centered square numbers. - The square frontier is the cap, not arithmetic. Verified. Row multiplicity at
96^2, 97^2, 98^2, 99^2, 100^2is321, 19, 480, 0, 123: the dense square families are exhausted, not excluded. Deepening the window to 96 terms, in the section below, writes at least 228 of the 316 squares and moves the first missed square from9801to38809 = 197^2. Oddness excludes nothing:97969is odd and written, and9801is missed for want of depth.
The depth of the window
The whole miss set is a statement about the rendered window, and the study measures how much of one rather than asserting it is harmless.
| rendered window | written | missed | first miss |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 terms | 5263 | 94737 | 269 |
| 32 terms | 8749 | 91251 | 269 |
| 48 terms | 11133 | 88867 | 269 |
- More than half the written set arrives past the head. Verified. 5870 of the 11133 written integers appear only past term 8 and 2384 only past term 32, so a census read off the ledger's own 8-term heads sees less than half of what 48 terms see, and its miss set starts
269, 281, 302, 311rather than269, 362, 422, 443. - A row's written column is rebuilt from its head and the stop rule alone. Verified. 3608 rows have a head whose finite differences terminate at order 6 or less, by degree
207, 1104, 569, 518, 1202, 0, 8. Extending the head by Newton forward differences and applying the pinned stop rule reproduces the row'swrittencolumn exactly for 1306 of 1306 ceiling-stopped rows and 1325 of 1333 cap-stopped rows; the 8 failures are exactly the rows whose head degree reads 6, which eight terms cannot certify. The 969 budget-stopped rows carry no rendered length in their head and are not testable this way, which is said rather than hidden. - Deepening the cap moves every window-relative number except the longest missed run. Verified. Extending only the 1325 cap-stopped rows the rebuild reproduces, out to 96 terms, gives a strict lower bound on the 96-term census: at least 11898 integers written, the first miss moved from 269 to 362, the longest written run at least 361, at least 228 of 316 squares. 269 becomes written; the run
95265..95711does not move. - That a missed integer is written by no row at any depth is Conjecture. 6802 rows are cut by the cap and their deeper terms are not rendered here; the 96-term reading is a lower bound, not a census, and the true frontier of the written set is not known at any depth.
The champions
| rank | integer | rows | rank | integer | rows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | 2858 | 6 | 64 | 2176 |
| 2 | 9 | 2811 | 7 | 3 | 1951 |
| 3 | 4 | 2559 | 8 | 6 | 1883 |
| 4 | 12 | 2303 | 9 | 8 | 1790 |
| 5 | 36 | 2270 | 10 | 33 | 1777 |
- The whole top of the census is small and mostly a power. Verified. All twenty champions lie below 65 - ascending,
2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 33, 36, 49, 64- and they carry 39007 of the 347308 incidences, a share of0.1123. The 366 perfect powers of1..100000carry 58906 incidences, a share of0.1696against a density of0.003660:46.34times their weight. - The champions are not the divisor-rich integers. Refuted. On
1..1000the mean row count is193.42over all integers,995.26over the squares and920.58over the perfect powers, but only170.60over the 413 integers with at least eight divisors - below the overall mean. Being a small perfect power is what a champion is; being highly divisible is not, and reads slightly against it. - Multiplicity is not driven by each row's first term. Refuted. Dropping every row's first rendered term removes 17036 of the 347308 incidences,
4.9%, and changes nothing that matters: the written set stays 11133, the never counts stay41,3589,88867in all three windows, and the leaders stay36at 2212,64at 2112,16at 2000,9at 1999 - the same integers in a different order. - The multiplicity spectrum is neither geometric nor a power law. Refuted. With
S(m)the count of integers written by at leastmrows,S(1) = 11133andS(2) = 8236give a ratio0.7398, which predictsS(64) = 6.312e-5against the observed 977 - wrong by seven orders. The spectrum takes 410 distinct values with a maximum of 2858. - The effect is a property of a measure column, not of a design. Verified.
euler.sidewrites 1 in 695 of its 859 rows,peak.sidewrites 12 in 809 of its 1261,heights.sidewrites both 9 and 33 in 765 of its 1261. A champion is an integer that one reading of the geometry returns for most designs at once. - The one champion that is neither small-smooth nor a power is an offset. Verified. 33 ranks tenth and is
3 * 11. The eight integers below 100 thatheights.sidewrites most often are9, 17, 25, 33, 41, 49, 57, 65, every one of them1 mod 8: the column runs arithmetic progressions whose common difference is a power of two, and33 - 1 = 2^5. The arithmetic of the champion is the arithmetic of the step, not of the integer. - The closed tier carries the census and the grid tiers carry its tail. Verified. Of the 11133 written integers the closed tier covers 7628 with 3983 exclusive, the side grid 6203 with 2603, the level grid 1826 with 541, the convolved tier 792 with 130. Above
30000there are 2174 written integers and the closed tier covers 1853 of them. - The tail is not a few dominant families. Refuted. Restricted to
30000..100000the rows' written sets collapse to 953 distinct families, and 875 of those families own a tail integer no other family writes - between them 2005 of the 2174 tail integers. So every cover of the written tail needs at least 875 families, and the tail is a wide superposition rather than a handful of dominant sequences.
Against the OEIS
Every search below is exhaustive on both sides: every window of the census sequence is indexed and every record of a local copy of the OEIS stripped dump is walked against that index, so no sampling of offsets is involved. The dump read holds 398817 records. Under the standing caveat of sequences a dump is a snapshot, so every absence here is Conjecture and needs a live re-read before it is repeated.
- The miss set is new to the OEIS only in its dense head. Conjecture. No record carries any 4-term window of the miss set at offsets
0..416; the first hit is at offset 417, in A049537. Above that the miss set does hit, and the hits are near-interval records rather than identifications: 852 hits atk = 4, 130 atk = 10, 37 atk = 15, 15 atk = 20, the 20-term witnesses being A112820 and A118471, each a sequence that runs a block of consecutive integers through a region the census misses wholesale. The head is the informative part and is clean: the string,269,362,422,443,appears nowhere in the dump. - The write-once set is absent at every offset. Conjecture. The 2897 integers written by exactly one row have no hit at any offset of any record at
k = 4, 10, 15, 20- a cleaner absence than the miss set's, because the once set is thin where the miss set is an interval complement. - The champion set meets two records for exactly twelve terms. Verified. Ascending, the twenty champions open
2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, which is a window of A100290 and of A336231 and of no other record. All three part at the thirteenth: A100290 gives 21, A336231 gives 19, the census gives 20. Both records are binary-digit conditions, which is the right neighbourhood - the registry's designs are corner subsets of a parity cube - and neither is the champion set. - The written-per-decade run meets one record and parts at the next term. Verified. The written counts by decade are
9, 90, 859, 5452, 4722with 100000 itself, summing to 11133. The prefix9, 90, 859sits inside A209631 alone, an exponential-transform array, which continues 6689 where the census gives 5452. - No recognizable family is systematically missed. Verified. 173 records hold at least ten distinct integers of
1..100000and lie wholly inside the miss set, the longest being A361796 at 41 terms. At a miss density of0.88867a 41-term run of misses has probability about10^-2.1, which 398817 records make ordinary: the census excludes nothing a catalogue would recognise, it just runs out of depth.
What is left
- Whether any integer of
1..100000is written by no row at any depth. The 96-term reading is a lower bound and already moves at least 765 of the misses across, 269 among them; the honest frontier needs a cap the dimension-2 side grid can pay for, and that tier costscap^3. Conjecture. - Whether the miss set has any arithmetic characterisation at all. No modulus to 64 separates it, no growth order does, and it is closed under nothing; the only theorem on offer is the finiteness bound above. Conjecture.
- Whether the 953 tail families are 953 rules. The families are de-duplicated by written set and not by generating rule, so two rules with equal truncated value sets merge and 953 is a lower bound on the number of rules, never an upper one. Conjecture that no bounded union of named families reaches the written tail.
- Whether the multiplicity function,
a(n)the number of rows writingn, is worth an entry. It is absent from the dump, but it is a function of the registry's own shape - the tier mix, the cap, the ceiling - and not ofnalone, so it is a reading of this instrument and not a sequence of the integers. Conjecture that no reparametrisation of it is submittable.
The rest of the tree
- README is the front door: the parity cube, the Kronecker product, and the index of every page.
- sequences is the ledger this page is the complement of: which sequences are known, against which integers are reached.
- method - how a claim here is produced and checked, worked through on the odd-side fill polynomial.
- DISCOVERIES - where every line above is tagged with its witness and its refutation attempt.
- REFS - every sequence id above resolved to a canonical URL.